<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Austin Real Estate Market Sales Update &#8211; 2006 Summary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/</link>
	<description>Austin Real Estate Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:40:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-489</guid>
		<description>Hi SpiecksForIt,

A quick look into the current activity there shows 15 Active, 4 Pending and 11 sold the first 3 months this year. Not too bad, but not great either. Hot areas have more Pendings than Actives at any given time. When Pending/Active numbers are about even, that&#039;s a good strong market. When there are a lot more for sale than Pending, as in this case, it means Buyers have a lot to pick from.

Lowest/Highest list prices so far this year are $129K/$245K. Avg sold this year so far is $175K with price per square foot ranging from $80 to $114.

If you send me your property addresses (from our contact page) I&#039;ll be happy to run a CMA for you and let you know what the current values are for your particular homes.
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi SpiecksForIt,</p>
<p>A quick look into the current activity there shows 15 Active, 4 Pending and 11 sold the first 3 months this year. Not too bad, but not great either. Hot areas have more Pendings than Actives at any given time. When Pending/Active numbers are about even, that&#8217;s a good strong market. When there are a lot more for sale than Pending, as in this case, it means Buyers have a lot to pick from.</p>
<p>Lowest/Highest list prices so far this year are $129K/$245K. Avg sold this year so far is $175K with price per square foot ranging from $80 to $114.</p>
<p>If you send me your property addresses (from our contact page) I&#8217;ll be happy to run a CMA for you and let you know what the current values are for your particular homes.<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiecksForIt</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiecksForIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-490</guid>
		<description>What are your thoughts on the Onion Creek area, SE of Austin?  We own D.R. Horton homes in a newer sub-division called Crossing at Onion Creek.  We purchased around $80-$85 per sq/ft in June 2005.  I was considering a 5 year hold and then 1031 into other properties.  What are you feelings about that area over the next several years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your thoughts on the Onion Creek area, SE of Austin?  We own D.R. Horton homes in a newer sub-division called Crossing at Onion Creek.  We purchased around $80-$85 per sq/ft in June 2005.  I was considering a 5 year hold and then 1031 into other properties.  What are you feelings about that area over the next several years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-487</guid>
		<description>HI CK,

Sorry, I don&#039;t have a 2004/2005 comparison. But I do know the market was just starting to come out of a 4-year flatline in 2005, so there wouln&#039;t be anything exciting to see.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI CK,</p>
<p>Sorry, I don&#8217;t have a 2004/2005 comparison. But I do know the market was just starting to come out of a 4-year flatline in 2005, so there wouln&#8217;t be anything exciting to see.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Hi - nice table comparing 2006-2005 MLS .  Do you have one comparing 2005-2004?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; nice table comparing 2006-2005 MLS .  Do you have one comparing 2005-2004?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Real Estate Blog - Austin TX Real Estate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Austin Real Estate Sales Update - Jan 2007 Stats</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Real Estate Blog - Austin TX Real Estate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Austin Real Estate Sales Update - Jan 2007 Stats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-486</guid>
		<description>[...] Buyer deals encountering multiple offers. Stats chart is below. Also, in case you missed it, the End of Year 2006 Austin Real Estate Market Summary breakdown has a lot of info and appreciation stats for the Austin Real Estate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Buyer deals encountering multiple offers. Stats chart is below. Also, in case you missed it, the End of Year 2006 Austin Real Estate Market Summary breakdown has a lot of info and appreciation stats for the Austin Real Estate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 21:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Scott,

I don&#039;t know of any zipcode sorted data. As far as appreciation trends, what do you want to know that isn&#039;t contained in the 2005/2006 summary that I posted here?
http://crosslandteam.com/200612-mls-sale-compare.pdf

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know of any zipcode sorted data. As far as appreciation trends, what do you want to know that isn&#8217;t contained in the 2005/2006 summary that I posted here?<br />
<a href="http://crosslandteam.com/200612-mls-sale-compare.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://crosslandteam.com/200612-mls-sale-compare.pdf</a></p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-484</guid>
		<description>Hi Charles,

I personally wouldn&#039;t buy in Pflugerville, but that doesn&#039;t mean it wouldn&#039;t work out for you. To me, there&#039;s just too much new construction going on there and nearby, and properties can be hard to lease. You also have to deal with IH35.

For $180K to $220K, I&#039;d stay in South, SW, or West Austin. If you need help, contact us.

Thanks
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charles,</p>
<p>I personally wouldn&#8217;t buy in Pflugerville, but that doesn&#8217;t mean it wouldn&#8217;t work out for you. To me, there&#8217;s just too much new construction going on there and nearby, and properties can be hard to lease. You also have to deal with IH35.</p>
<p>For $180K to $220K, I&#8217;d stay in South, SW, or West Austin. If you need help, contact us.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-483</guid>
		<description>What are your thoughts on Pflugerville&#039;s appreciation potential in the next 2-3 years with all the upcoming commercial plans? We&#039;re interested in properties in the 180K-220K range with the potential for some great appreciation, but could use a bit of help finding it. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your thoughts on Pflugerville&#8217;s appreciation potential in the next 2-3 years with all the upcoming commercial plans? We&#8217;re interested in properties in the 180K-220K range with the potential for some great appreciation, but could use a bit of help finding it. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-482</guid>
		<description>So where would someone go to get a sense of appreciation rates/trends etc...?  Is there any data available by zip code? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So where would someone go to get a sense of appreciation rates/trends etc&#8230;?  Is there any data available by zip code? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-481</guid>
		<description>I have a feeling appreciation by area won&#039;t be accurate for a while. The MLS areas are being changed right now and I&#039;ve noticed some listings are &#039;stuck&#039; in their old areas. Specifically: RR, 4, 10, SW and 1B have all been split up or remapped and some current and past listings are in the incorrect areas.

Also, I&#039;ve noticed that excluding minor outlying areas of the MLS system will show a greater drop in solds and and a somewhat higher avg. price. I think areas like Hutto, Manor and Bastrop have a lot of turnover but not much appreciation due to the constant foreclosures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling appreciation by area won&#8217;t be accurate for a while. The MLS areas are being changed right now and I&#8217;ve noticed some listings are &#8216;stuck&#8217; in their old areas. Specifically: RR, 4, 10, SW and 1B have all been split up or remapped and some current and past listings are in the incorrect areas.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;ve noticed that excluding minor outlying areas of the MLS system will show a greater drop in solds and and a somewhat higher avg. price. I think areas like Hutto, Manor and Bastrop have a lot of turnover but not much appreciation due to the constant foreclosures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-480</guid>
		<description>The data doesn&#039;t suggest any softening in that range at all. Look at the MLS area breakdown and the areas that had average prices of $400K+ in 2005, and you see that those areas are all up in 2006, some by quite a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The data doesn&#8217;t suggest any softening in that range at all. Look at the MLS area breakdown and the areas that had average prices of $400K+ in 2005, and you see that those areas are all up in 2006, some by quite a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-479</guid>
		<description>Hey Steve,  Are you seeing any softening in price for the areas that offer homes in the &gt;$400k price range? Someone mentioned it to me that it might be happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve,  Are you seeing any softening in price for the areas that offer homes in the &gt;$400k price range? Someone mentioned it to me that it might be happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

All the data has to looked at together. That&#039;s why I tried to create a chart that allows that. For example, if an area has rising prices, but the avg square footage is also rising and the price per sqft is staying the same or falling, then the rising prices don&#039;t necessarily mean what they might first appear to mean.

The Austin Statesman led off there main real estate market article yesterday with &quot;Hutto is Hot&quot; because the number of sales is up 60% over last year. But when you look at the numbers, that&#039;s only a couple hundred additional sales (354 to 565). Big deal - one new subdivision alone could generate 200 new sales in a year. That doesn&#039;t make &quot;Hutto Hot&quot;. It is a growing, emerging area, but not what I would call &quot;hot&quot; when you look at the other numbers.

Anyway, that&#039;s my take on it and how I look at these stats - sort of all together and in context. No one piece of data can tell the whole story.

Steev</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>All the data has to looked at together. That&#8217;s why I tried to create a chart that allows that. For example, if an area has rising prices, but the avg square footage is also rising and the price per sqft is staying the same or falling, then the rising prices don&#8217;t necessarily mean what they might first appear to mean.</p>
<p>The Austin Statesman led off there main real estate market article yesterday with &#8220;Hutto is Hot&#8221; because the number of sales is up 60% over last year. But when you look at the numbers, that&#8217;s only a couple hundred additional sales (354 to 565). Big deal &#8211; one new subdivision alone could generate 200 new sales in a year. That doesn&#8217;t make &#8220;Hutto Hot&#8221;. It is a growing, emerging area, but not what I would call &#8220;hot&#8221; when you look at the other numbers.</p>
<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s my take on it and how I look at these stats &#8211; sort of all together and in context. No one piece of data can tell the whole story.</p>
<p>Steev</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ben.crosslandteam.com/blog/2007/01/29/austin-real-estate-market-sales-update-2006-summary/#comment-477</guid>
		<description>Steve, great info as usual. So what is the best determinant as to what is happening with an area with regard to appreciation?    Is &#039;avg sold price&#039; better than &#039;med sold price&#039; or &#039;$ per sq ft&#039; better to understand what is going on with an area? Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, great info as usual. So what is the best determinant as to what is happening with an area with regard to appreciation?    Is &#8216;avg sold price&#8217; better than &#8216;med sold price&#8217; or &#8216;$ per sq ft&#8217; better to understand what is going on with an area? Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

