<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Repair Negotiations &#8211; What is Reasonable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/</link>
	<description>Austin Real Estate Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 17:13:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-118658</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 19:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-118658</guid>
		<description>Am I being unreasonable?

We got a contract on our 5 year old home.  The buyers failed to get the inspection until the day AFTER the inspection period and we went ahead and granted them the extension.  The same day we granted the inspection we got a full price CASH backup offer on the house.

The inspection notice came in today and the the inspector must have been justifying his existence. 

here were their requests.  
1.  fireplace must be operational. (the inspector  couldnt figure out how to turn it on) other than he must have missed the fact that there is a loop on a frame that covers the fireplace to reduce drafts I have no idea why he could not figure out how to turn on a self contained gas fireplace.  Our response.. The fire place is operational.  verbal explanation to buyer.  Remove the cover, pull down the grill, light the pilot light, turn it on.  It worked all winter when the house was on the market.

2. Level AC unit.  It sits on a gravel pad some rock has slid out from under the plastic &quot;pad&quot;.  Our respones... No.

3. Bolt deck to house.    It a 5 yo house the deck is solid.  it has 5 columns to the ground and stairs.  The bolts are $2.59 a piece and IF i were EXTRA OCD I&#039;d have to put 40 in for a total of $100... Our response... No

I think these are as you mentioned knick nack things that really are not life safety.  the house is not going to burn down and the mechanical system is fine.  

Am I wrong?  The difference between the offers is only $5000 so its not like i&#039;m looking for a way out.  Closing for either of our contracts are within 3 days of each other so we are still out of the house by the end of May.  

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I being unreasonable?</p>
<p>We got a contract on our 5 year old home.  The buyers failed to get the inspection until the day AFTER the inspection period and we went ahead and granted them the extension.  The same day we granted the inspection we got a full price CASH backup offer on the house.</p>
<p>The inspection notice came in today and the the inspector must have been justifying his existence. </p>
<p>here were their requests.<br />
1.  fireplace must be operational. (the inspector  couldnt figure out how to turn it on) other than he must have missed the fact that there is a loop on a frame that covers the fireplace to reduce drafts I have no idea why he could not figure out how to turn on a self contained gas fireplace.  Our response.. The fire place is operational.  verbal explanation to buyer.  Remove the cover, pull down the grill, light the pilot light, turn it on.  It worked all winter when the house was on the market.</p>
<p>2. Level AC unit.  It sits on a gravel pad some rock has slid out from under the plastic &#8220;pad&#8221;.  Our respones&#8230; No.</p>
<p>3. Bolt deck to house.    It a 5 yo house the deck is solid.  it has 5 columns to the ground and stairs.  The bolts are $2.59 a piece and IF i were EXTRA OCD I&#8217;d have to put 40 in for a total of $100&#8230; Our response&#8230; No</p>
<p>I think these are as you mentioned knick nack things that really are not life safety.  the house is not going to burn down and the mechanical system is fine.  </p>
<p>Am I wrong?  The difference between the offers is only $5000 so its not like i&#8217;m looking for a way out.  Closing for either of our contracts are within 3 days of each other so we are still out of the house by the end of May.  </p>
<p>Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-104197</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-104197</guid>
		<description>Hi - We are selling a 100-year-old home in the Boston area. It is a two-family gambrel roof Victorian split down the middle front to back by a firewall.  We negotiated a price with the buyers, a couple who is not in a hurry to move in because they want to do some renovations.  Their inspector reported 77 pages of minor and significant problems, some reasonable like foundation stones needing repointing, an electrical service upgrade, etc.  The critical issue is that the rafters supporting the roof of this third-floor structure have pulled away slightly from the their attachment at the top of the firewall. we have seen no cracks or any other signs of movement of the overall structure in the 18 years we&#039;ve lived there, although there is some slope to the upper floor especially..
  the buyers then hired a structural engineer who said the second and third floors are insufficiently supported, with most of the weight transferring to the side porch that runs 2/3 of house, and which probably has subsided a bit over the years. their engineer insists that there needs to be a foundation poured under the porch ( or possibly sonotubes), the rafters need to be reattached (obviously) but that in addition, the walls need to be opened up and beams and posts be installed to support the second and third floor.  The buyers want $70,000 knocked off the agreed on price of $675,000 to pay for all of this.
We have consulted an historical renovation architect who has done work on our house, a high-end builder (friend) who does a lot of renovations, and, today, a structural engineer who looked at the house. All agree that shoring the porch foundation and reattaching the rafters, along with some other basement rafter work, is sufficient, and they see no need for additional supports and beams. (The other side of the building is a mirror image, and they have had no problems.) We have had estimates that $20-$22,000 in repairs are needed.
   However, the buyers&#039; engineer won&#039;t back off his assessment, and the buyers say they will walk if we don&#039;t come down the full $70,000.  We&#039;re in a real bind because after a long search we found a home we love in a great location and have to go to purchase and sale next week, or we&#039;ll lose it.   We feel the buyers aren&#039;t acting in good faith or willing to compromise, so regrettably we will have to let them walk, do the repairs ourselves, and start the whole process over again frmo square one.
   This is a very upsetting epidsode but shows you what happens when engineers disagree and buyers play hardball.
thanks for listening
richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; We are selling a 100-year-old home in the Boston area. It is a two-family gambrel roof Victorian split down the middle front to back by a firewall.  We negotiated a price with the buyers, a couple who is not in a hurry to move in because they want to do some renovations.  Their inspector reported 77 pages of minor and significant problems, some reasonable like foundation stones needing repointing, an electrical service upgrade, etc.  The critical issue is that the rafters supporting the roof of this third-floor structure have pulled away slightly from the their attachment at the top of the firewall. we have seen no cracks or any other signs of movement of the overall structure in the 18 years we&#8217;ve lived there, although there is some slope to the upper floor especially..<br />
  the buyers then hired a structural engineer who said the second and third floors are insufficiently supported, with most of the weight transferring to the side porch that runs 2/3 of house, and which probably has subsided a bit over the years. their engineer insists that there needs to be a foundation poured under the porch ( or possibly sonotubes), the rafters need to be reattached (obviously) but that in addition, the walls need to be opened up and beams and posts be installed to support the second and third floor.  The buyers want $70,000 knocked off the agreed on price of $675,000 to pay for all of this.<br />
We have consulted an historical renovation architect who has done work on our house, a high-end builder (friend) who does a lot of renovations, and, today, a structural engineer who looked at the house. All agree that shoring the porch foundation and reattaching the rafters, along with some other basement rafter work, is sufficient, and they see no need for additional supports and beams. (The other side of the building is a mirror image, and they have had no problems.) We have had estimates that $20-$22,000 in repairs are needed.<br />
   However, the buyers&#8217; engineer won&#8217;t back off his assessment, and the buyers say they will walk if we don&#8217;t come down the full $70,000.  We&#8217;re in a real bind because after a long search we found a home we love in a great location and have to go to purchase and sale next week, or we&#8217;ll lose it.   We feel the buyers aren&#8217;t acting in good faith or willing to compromise, so regrettably we will have to let them walk, do the repairs ourselves, and start the whole process over again frmo square one.<br />
   This is a very upsetting epidsode but shows you what happens when engineers disagree and buyers play hardball.<br />
thanks for listening<br />
richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-94052</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-94052</guid>
		<description>Hi Jan,

The Option Period is intended to provide an inspection and due diligence period, though it does serve as a &quot;walk-away-for-any-reason&quot; clause. Yes, it&#039;s fair as it compensates the seller for removing the home from the market and also serves to make buyers think twice about trying up multiple properties with offers, since they have to cough up earnest money and Option Fee on each one.

If you found a house you like, why would you want to keep bidding others?

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jan,</p>
<p>The Option Period is intended to provide an inspection and due diligence period, though it does serve as a &#8220;walk-away-for-any-reason&#8221; clause. Yes, it&#8217;s fair as it compensates the seller for removing the home from the market and also serves to make buyers think twice about trying up multiple properties with offers, since they have to cough up earnest money and Option Fee on each one.</p>
<p>If you found a house you like, why would you want to keep bidding others?</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Chen</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-93946</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 07:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-93946</guid>
		<description>Is it fair to let buyer to pay the option fee for inspection during option period since buyer need spend inspection fee no matter whether he&#039;ll buy the property because of poor inspection? Is inspection a contingency in a purchase contract? In my opinion, It is fair to pay option fee to have more time to bid other houses but not for inpection alone. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it fair to let buyer to pay the option fee for inspection during option period since buyer need spend inspection fee no matter whether he&#8217;ll buy the property because of poor inspection? Is inspection a contingency in a purchase contract? In my opinion, It is fair to pay option fee to have more time to bid other houses but not for inpection alone. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-93815</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-93815</guid>
		<description>Hi Dee,

I can&#039;t comment on or advise your negotiations. Your agent should be able to do that. But I do wish you luck.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dee,</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t comment on or advise your negotiations. Your agent should be able to do that. But I do wish you luck.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-93789</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-93789</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m presently in negotiations with the seller and his agent to repair a deck that the inspector considers is out of code.  He states that the deck should not be repaired but totally replaced.  We have been back and forth with this issue for almost 2 weeks because the seller doesn&#039;t want to spend the money.  The seller states that he wants to reinforce and secure the deck with new boards and to anchor the deck to the house. I asked the inspector if this was reasonable and he said &quot;absolutely not&quot;.  I&#039;m at a standstill because this is the only issue that I have with the house that the seller seems to be unreasonable.  What should I do? Also, let me add, I am purchasing the home with an FHA loan and was told it may not be approved because of the deck.  I need help from an expert.
Thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m presently in negotiations with the seller and his agent to repair a deck that the inspector considers is out of code.  He states that the deck should not be repaired but totally replaced.  We have been back and forth with this issue for almost 2 weeks because the seller doesn&#8217;t want to spend the money.  The seller states that he wants to reinforce and secure the deck with new boards and to anchor the deck to the house. I asked the inspector if this was reasonable and he said &#8220;absolutely not&#8221;.  I&#8217;m at a standstill because this is the only issue that I have with the house that the seller seems to be unreasonable.  What should I do? Also, let me add, I am purchasing the home with an FHA loan and was told it may not be approved because of the deck.  I need help from an expert.<br />
Thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-89096</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-89096</guid>
		<description>Dana,

If the bad slab was unknown and not factored into the offer price, it&#039;s not unreasonable. It would be an expected request for the seller to cure it, or compensate for the cost.

On the other hand, the seller is required to do nothing. Your recourse is to terminate the deal. Yours and the seller&#039;s agent should be able to help you and the seller negotiate a win/win.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dana,</p>
<p>If the bad slab was unknown and not factored into the offer price, it&#8217;s not unreasonable. It would be an expected request for the seller to cure it, or compensate for the cost.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the seller is required to do nothing. Your recourse is to terminate the deal. Yours and the seller&#8217;s agent should be able to help you and the seller negotiate a win/win.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-89089</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-89089</guid>
		<description>Do you think it&#039;s reasonable to ask the seller for needed foundation work per our structural engineer on a 50 year old home?  We&#039;ve had two bids so far and the estimate amount is $12,000.  We are still in our option period and not sure what to expect.  Has this ever happened to you on either end?  Also, if FHA doesn&#039;t approve our loan because of this foundation situation, doesn&#039;t the seller HAVE to repair the foundation for us?  I know this all might sound &#039;green&#039; to you but I&#039;m just a little ol&#039; buyer with a newbie agent and need some expertise.  
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think it&#8217;s reasonable to ask the seller for needed foundation work per our structural engineer on a 50 year old home?  We&#8217;ve had two bids so far and the estimate amount is $12,000.  We are still in our option period and not sure what to expect.  Has this ever happened to you on either end?  Also, if FHA doesn&#8217;t approve our loan because of this foundation situation, doesn&#8217;t the seller HAVE to repair the foundation for us?  I know this all might sound &#8216;green&#8217; to you but I&#8217;m just a little ol&#8217; buyer with a newbie agent and need some expertise.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raul</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-36172</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-36172</guid>
		<description>John, 
Hopefully you were able to resolve your option-period repairs.This will always be a subjective issue. Sellers want to spend as little as possible and buyers want to get as much as possible for their hard-earned money (regardless of price) In my opinion, however, you were not out of bounds asking for those big-price items to be corrected. Why would a &quot;new&quot; owner have to pay for deferred maintanace?

Good Luck,
Raul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
Hopefully you were able to resolve your option-period repairs.This will always be a subjective issue. Sellers want to spend as little as possible and buyers want to get as much as possible for their hard-earned money (regardless of price) In my opinion, however, you were not out of bounds asking for those big-price items to be corrected. Why would a &#8220;new&#8221; owner have to pay for deferred maintanace?</p>
<p>Good Luck,<br />
Raul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-35217</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-35217</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

It doesn&#039;t surprise me that the listing Realtor lost his cool. I would simply have your agent present your rationale, and try to leave emotion out of it. It helps if you have a strong number 2 choice that you can pursue. Sometimes stubborn sellers get their way because the buyer has already emotionally attached themselves to the home and is loathe to walk away.

I&#039;d simply add up all the unexpected costs, add that amount to the contract price, and ask yourself if you are willing to pay that amount for the home. Is the home still worth it?

On the other hand, if what you describe is what might be found in the next home you pursue, walking away might not be wise. But it is VERY important to know and understand what you are really paying for the home, and that cost includes the curing of neglected mechanical equipment.

Good Luck,

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t surprise me that the listing Realtor lost his cool. I would simply have your agent present your rationale, and try to leave emotion out of it. It helps if you have a strong number 2 choice that you can pursue. Sometimes stubborn sellers get their way because the buyer has already emotionally attached themselves to the home and is loathe to walk away.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d simply add up all the unexpected costs, add that amount to the contract price, and ask yourself if you are willing to pay that amount for the home. Is the home still worth it?</p>
<p>On the other hand, if what you describe is what might be found in the next home you pursue, walking away might not be wise. But it is VERY important to know and understand what you are really paying for the home, and that cost includes the curing of neglected mechanical equipment.</p>
<p>Good Luck,</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-35211</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-35211</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Interesting article. I&#039;m from the east coast and currently in the negotiation process resulting from the home inspection. Our inspector identified some major issues with what I like to call the &quot;lifeblood&quot; of the home. For example, a 22 year old furnance (2 years past its useful lifecycle IMO), a 22 year old hot water heater (10-12 years past its lifecycle IMO),  a AC unit approaching 15 years old (15-17 yr lifecycle IMO), and a 75ft tree that is clearly dying. We actually submitted a request to replace the HVAC, hot water heater and remove the tree. We figured if we are about to pay Ferrari prices why should we be stuck with the impending bill to replace old, outdated and soon to be less than efficient systems in addition to a major safety hazard.

Of course I don&#039;t expect the seller to agree to this, but never expected the realtor to lose his cool with my realtor before he even discussed it with his clients. In your opinion were we out of bounds or were we doing nothing more than any other person would do wrt identifying major flaws with a home priced in the mid 600K range with the expectation that we ask for it all knowing we&#039;ll be negotiating a viable solution for all parties involved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Interesting article. I&#8217;m from the east coast and currently in the negotiation process resulting from the home inspection. Our inspector identified some major issues with what I like to call the &#8220;lifeblood&#8221; of the home. For example, a 22 year old furnance (2 years past its useful lifecycle IMO), a 22 year old hot water heater (10-12 years past its lifecycle IMO),  a AC unit approaching 15 years old (15-17 yr lifecycle IMO), and a 75ft tree that is clearly dying. We actually submitted a request to replace the HVAC, hot water heater and remove the tree. We figured if we are about to pay Ferrari prices why should we be stuck with the impending bill to replace old, outdated and soon to be less than efficient systems in addition to a major safety hazard.</p>
<p>Of course I don&#8217;t expect the seller to agree to this, but never expected the realtor to lose his cool with my realtor before he even discussed it with his clients. In your opinion were we out of bounds or were we doing nothing more than any other person would do wrt identifying major flaws with a home priced in the mid 600K range with the expectation that we ask for it all knowing we&#8217;ll be negotiating a viable solution for all parties involved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-34078</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-34078</guid>
		<description>Hi Kristen,

I agree with you on this point. If a home is advertised as &quot;fully remodelled&quot;, there are certain aspects of a remodel that are assumed. But in the end, we see a lot of &quot;rehabs&quot; that are simply cosmetic treatments that leave the underlying components of the home in original condition. It still comes down to a negotiation between the buyer and seller.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kristen,</p>
<p>I agree with you on this point. If a home is advertised as &#8220;fully remodelled&#8221;, there are certain aspects of a remodel that are assumed. But in the end, we see a lot of &#8220;rehabs&#8221; that are simply cosmetic treatments that leave the underlying components of the home in original condition. It still comes down to a negotiation between the buyer and seller.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-34071</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-34071</guid>
		<description>I am curious to know your opinion. You said that you did not think it was reasonable to ask for &quot;safety&quot; items that were up to code when the house was originally built, but does not conform to current code requirements. What if that home has been flipped and upgraded but the sellers chose to only update certain things? It seems to me that if they have done any upgrading, then the missing GFI outlets, or the flex gas line supplying the furnace should have been taken care of. I don&#039;t think that it is unreasonable to expect the sellers to pay for those things if they are trying to sell you an &quot;upgraded&quot; home, even if it is an older home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious to know your opinion. You said that you did not think it was reasonable to ask for &#8220;safety&#8221; items that were up to code when the house was originally built, but does not conform to current code requirements. What if that home has been flipped and upgraded but the sellers chose to only update certain things? It seems to me that if they have done any upgrading, then the missing GFI outlets, or the flex gas line supplying the furnace should have been taken care of. I don&#8217;t think that it is unreasonable to expect the sellers to pay for those things if they are trying to sell you an &#8220;upgraded&#8221; home, even if it is an older home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-33128</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-33128</guid>
		<description>As a buyer, send the inspection report on over to the seller after its done.  Then, they pretty much have to disclose the issues if the deal falls through.  This might be close to strong-arm tactics in some sellers/realtors books, but not mine.  Buyers, you really should be at the inspection!  You are paying for it and its a great way to learn about your house.  If you know a thing or two, you may even spot issues that the inspector doesn&#039;t.

As for your 1970s house example with Aluminum wiring, it is reasonable to ask for an electrician to double check things, especially the junction box and possible have it replaced.  A crummy (or incorrect, say one for copper wiring) junction box is the case of many of problems with Aluminum wiring.  Sometimes tightening the screws in the box is in order to sure things are safe.

Sellers, be prepared for a long list of things the buyer might want fixed.  You probably asked the same of the previous seller.  Its all part of the game with all the parties that are involved (far too many if you ask me - realtors, title company, lawyers, banks/mortgage brokers, home inspectors, insurance agents, county tax assessors, city of austin now).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a buyer, send the inspection report on over to the seller after its done.  Then, they pretty much have to disclose the issues if the deal falls through.  This might be close to strong-arm tactics in some sellers/realtors books, but not mine.  Buyers, you really should be at the inspection!  You are paying for it and its a great way to learn about your house.  If you know a thing or two, you may even spot issues that the inspector doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>As for your 1970s house example with Aluminum wiring, it is reasonable to ask for an electrician to double check things, especially the junction box and possible have it replaced.  A crummy (or incorrect, say one for copper wiring) junction box is the case of many of problems with Aluminum wiring.  Sometimes tightening the screws in the box is in order to sure things are safe.</p>
<p>Sellers, be prepared for a long list of things the buyer might want fixed.  You probably asked the same of the previous seller.  Its all part of the game with all the parties that are involved (far too many if you ask me &#8211; realtors, title company, lawyers, banks/mortgage brokers, home inspectors, insurance agents, county tax assessors, city of austin now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-32808</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 04:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-32808</guid>
		<description>Of course, the buying/selling process is generally one that is emotionally influenced despite the best intentions of the parties.  Add to this that pricing is always a little suspect -- once you get out of the cookie cutter house, it is almost impossible to say what the comparative market value of a house is down to the last dollar.  This leaves a large gray area in negotitations where emotions can drive the process.

Case in point -- when we bought our house last year, the sellers has already moved out and had a temporary tenant.  The house had been on the market for nearly a year; overpriced and already had a $50k reduction when we came along.  We saw a house that had had some updating but still had much left to do, and there were quite a few deferred maintenance issues (the loose gutter by the entrance and overgrown landscaping obvious ones).  So our view was that we were buying a project house with good bones.  We negotiated somewhat agressively on price to get a good, not great deal according to our agent and the available comparables.  

Of course, from the sellers&#039; perspective, they had a house in great condition that they had renovated and were giving away.  Our inspection came up with a long list of items, some of them of the type Steve say shouldn&#039;t be included like out of code items.  But others were maintenance problems or issues due to faulty workmanship in the previous renovations.  The repair cost came out to $12k -- very reasonable from my perspective.  Not to the sellers, of course. If I hadn&#039;t been very flexible on assuming most of the repair costs, it is very possible the deal wouldn&#039;t have gone through.  In the end, I got a reasonble closing price on a house that was good for us -- but that remains a series of improvement projects.  The sellers, I am sure, feel they gave the house away (especially given the high initial asking price).

So, long story short, it is good to have a discussion about reasonable things to ask for, but these issues are rarely cut and dried given the imprecision in pricing and issues that come with older homes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the buying/selling process is generally one that is emotionally influenced despite the best intentions of the parties.  Add to this that pricing is always a little suspect &#8212; once you get out of the cookie cutter house, it is almost impossible to say what the comparative market value of a house is down to the last dollar.  This leaves a large gray area in negotitations where emotions can drive the process.</p>
<p>Case in point &#8212; when we bought our house last year, the sellers has already moved out and had a temporary tenant.  The house had been on the market for nearly a year; overpriced and already had a $50k reduction when we came along.  We saw a house that had had some updating but still had much left to do, and there were quite a few deferred maintenance issues (the loose gutter by the entrance and overgrown landscaping obvious ones).  So our view was that we were buying a project house with good bones.  We negotiated somewhat agressively on price to get a good, not great deal according to our agent and the available comparables.  </p>
<p>Of course, from the sellers&#8217; perspective, they had a house in great condition that they had renovated and were giving away.  Our inspection came up with a long list of items, some of them of the type Steve say shouldn&#8217;t be included like out of code items.  But others were maintenance problems or issues due to faulty workmanship in the previous renovations.  The repair cost came out to $12k &#8212; very reasonable from my perspective.  Not to the sellers, of course. If I hadn&#8217;t been very flexible on assuming most of the repair costs, it is very possible the deal wouldn&#8217;t have gone through.  In the end, I got a reasonble closing price on a house that was good for us &#8212; but that remains a series of improvement projects.  The sellers, I am sure, feel they gave the house away (especially given the high initial asking price).</p>
<p>So, long story short, it is good to have a discussion about reasonable things to ask for, but these issues are rarely cut and dried given the imprecision in pricing and issues that come with older homes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-32183</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-32183</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

Yes, I wish pre-inspections were common practice in Texas. It makes a lot of sense. We have seller perform one when the property has a lot of deferred maintenance, but it&#039;s fairly rare to see pre-inspections in our market. 

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>Yes, I wish pre-inspections were common practice in Texas. It makes a lot of sense. We have seller perform one when the property has a lot of deferred maintenance, but it&#8217;s fairly rare to see pre-inspections in our market. </p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Blockhus</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-32181</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Blockhus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-32181</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Maybe it is just a difference in business practices between real estate practitioners in California (SIlicon Valley) with those of Texas, but our listing agent&#039;s typically have the seller get pre-listing inspections prior to putting the home on the market.  This gives the seller a better idea of potential costs/issues that might come up.  These are also given to the buyer prior to any offer presentation so that the buyer has an idea as to the home&#039;s conditoin prior to writing an offer.

Pre-listing inspections fon&#039;t proclude the buyer from doing his/her own inspections, but rather it adds the seller&#039;s disclosure on the property&#039;s condition.  The more information, the more comfortable the buyer feels about his/her purchase.

Once a contract is ratified, it is more likely to close because there are less unknowns about the property.  I highly recommend having my seller&#039;s spend $600-$800 up front to eliminate substantial costs (could be in the thousands of dollars) down the line because the buyer wants to re-negotiate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Maybe it is just a difference in business practices between real estate practitioners in California (SIlicon Valley) with those of Texas, but our listing agent&#8217;s typically have the seller get pre-listing inspections prior to putting the home on the market.  This gives the seller a better idea of potential costs/issues that might come up.  These are also given to the buyer prior to any offer presentation so that the buyer has an idea as to the home&#8217;s conditoin prior to writing an offer.</p>
<p>Pre-listing inspections fon&#8217;t proclude the buyer from doing his/her own inspections, but rather it adds the seller&#8217;s disclosure on the property&#8217;s condition.  The more information, the more comfortable the buyer feels about his/her purchase.</p>
<p>Once a contract is ratified, it is more likely to close because there are less unknowns about the property.  I highly recommend having my seller&#8217;s spend $600-$800 up front to eliminate substantial costs (could be in the thousands of dollars) down the line because the buyer wants to re-negotiate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lenny</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2008/09/04/repair-negotiations-what-is-reasonable/#comment-31712</link>
		<dc:creator>lenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=497#comment-31712</guid>
		<description>yes...yes...yes...yes... !!!!

talking about taking the words from my mouth!!!

human nature is what it is...
human emotions are what they are...

examples:
multi-multi multi millionaire finds the perfect house... i always use the &quot;hide $2,500 under your mattress for the repair issues the seller may refuse to fix&quot;... the inspection turns up virtually nothing!!!.... cept the few windows looking out to the lake that are fogged (only at certain times of the day/year/sun position...)... $1,900 estimate to replace these widow glasses!!!.... the seller says &quot;we came down to meet your offer price... we will not fix the windows... we have lived here since the home was built and NEVER have seen any problem with the windows&quot;...  so i talk with the buyer about that $2,500 under their mattress... the buyer says &quot;i am not going to buy this guys house!!!&quot;....  (contract terminated... both buyer and seller have remorse... i get them talking... they both apologize... go to closing)...  i forgot to mention the fact that the seller also used the fact that they spent $6,800 on an outdoor grille... and that the buyer should be happy with the fact that the grille was conveying... BUT the buyer replied back (against my suggestions) that they didn&#039;t give a hoot about the grille... SO THE SELLER TOOK A SLEDGE HAMMER TO THE GRILLE!!!!!

but... SO many other deals have just died.... EMOTIONS run rampart... intelligent thought disappears...

i could go on for another 100 pages....
some get to closing... some don&#039;t...

one other &quot;deal&quot;:.... retired military buyer... contral FREAK!!!.... we find the perfect house.... $100,000 under valued (buyer knew it upon first step into the property)... everything going ok.... a little rough during option/inspection.... we get through it... 1 week from closing the buyer calls me to tell me that they are NOT going to buy the house if the seller does NOT fix the deck where the hot tub was removed (1 year old $12,000 hot tub)... buyer just didn&#039;t want it... contract called for seller to remove it.... I SCREWED up and did&#039;nt addess deck repairs after removal!!!... (live and learn!!)... buyer was adament.... terminated contract... threatened to sue seller for earnest money (past option period)... buyers wife almost had a nervous breakdown.... she KNEW this was a 1 in a million bargain!!!.... she actually took off 1 week from work and cried!!!!.... the seller IMMEDIATELY got another full price offer.... ... ... ... ... ... listing agent called me 3 weeks later to tell me the unthinkable happened... new buyer lost job!!!!.... i called my buyers to tell them.... AND HUSBAND STILL INSISTED on seller repairing deck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....... long story short... I paid the $1,500 out of my pocket to fix the deck!!!!............   

PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes&#8230;yes&#8230;yes&#8230;yes&#8230; !!!!</p>
<p>talking about taking the words from my mouth!!!</p>
<p>human nature is what it is&#8230;<br />
human emotions are what they are&#8230;</p>
<p>examples:<br />
multi-multi multi millionaire finds the perfect house&#8230; i always use the &#8220;hide $2,500 under your mattress for the repair issues the seller may refuse to fix&#8221;&#8230; the inspection turns up virtually nothing!!!&#8230;. cept the few windows looking out to the lake that are fogged (only at certain times of the day/year/sun position&#8230;)&#8230; $1,900 estimate to replace these widow glasses!!!&#8230;. the seller says &#8220;we came down to meet your offer price&#8230; we will not fix the windows&#8230; we have lived here since the home was built and NEVER have seen any problem with the windows&#8221;&#8230;  so i talk with the buyer about that $2,500 under their mattress&#8230; the buyer says &#8220;i am not going to buy this guys house!!!&#8221;&#8230;.  (contract terminated&#8230; both buyer and seller have remorse&#8230; i get them talking&#8230; they both apologize&#8230; go to closing)&#8230;  i forgot to mention the fact that the seller also used the fact that they spent $6,800 on an outdoor grille&#8230; and that the buyer should be happy with the fact that the grille was conveying&#8230; BUT the buyer replied back (against my suggestions) that they didn&#8217;t give a hoot about the grille&#8230; SO THE SELLER TOOK A SLEDGE HAMMER TO THE GRILLE!!!!!</p>
<p>but&#8230; SO many other deals have just died&#8230;. EMOTIONS run rampart&#8230; intelligent thought disappears&#8230;</p>
<p>i could go on for another 100 pages&#8230;.<br />
some get to closing&#8230; some don&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
<p>one other &#8220;deal&#8221;:&#8230;. retired military buyer&#8230; contral FREAK!!!&#8230;. we find the perfect house&#8230;. $100,000 under valued (buyer knew it upon first step into the property)&#8230; everything going ok&#8230;. a little rough during option/inspection&#8230;. we get through it&#8230; 1 week from closing the buyer calls me to tell me that they are NOT going to buy the house if the seller does NOT fix the deck where the hot tub was removed (1 year old $12,000 hot tub)&#8230; buyer just didn&#8217;t want it&#8230; contract called for seller to remove it&#8230;. I SCREWED up and did&#8217;nt addess deck repairs after removal!!!&#8230; (live and learn!!)&#8230; buyer was adament&#8230;. terminated contract&#8230; threatened to sue seller for earnest money (past option period)&#8230; buyers wife almost had a nervous breakdown&#8230;. she KNEW this was a 1 in a million bargain!!!&#8230;. she actually took off 1 week from work and cried!!!!&#8230;. the seller IMMEDIATELY got another full price offer&#8230;. &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; listing agent called me 3 weeks later to tell me the unthinkable happened&#8230; new buyer lost job!!!!&#8230;. i called my buyers to tell them&#8230;. AND HUSBAND STILL INSISTED on seller repairing deck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!&#8230;&#8230;. long story short&#8230; I paid the $1,500 out of my pocket to fix the deck!!!!&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;   </p>
<p>PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

