<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: City of Austin Energy Conservation Audit and Disclosure (ECAD) Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/</link>
	<description>Austin Real Estate Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 17:13:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland, Austin REALTOR</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-121429</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland, Austin REALTOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-121429</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

No, we haven&#039;t found that &quot;good&quot; or &quot;bad&quot; energy audits affect the price or negotiation at all. In fact, after all the hype settled down, we stopped providing the Audit up front unless the agent wrote it into the contract. Otherwise we just provide it to the buyer at or before closing as required, and that hasn&#039;t been a problem.

For our buyers, we write it into the offer that the seller will provide it prior to the end of the Option Period. But it&#039;s never been a factor in the deal or caused a buyer to feel happy or sad.

Mainly, the audits are predictable and boring as they all say basically the same thing, which is: Add insulation, weather stripping, solar screens and seal the ducts. Those same 4 things dominate almost every audit, All homes have leaking ducts.

Therefore, we can tell a buyer in advance what the audit will say and be right 99% of the time. This makes it a non-eventful, perfunctory step in the process.

Other agents may report a different experience based on how they handle things.
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>No, we haven&#8217;t found that &#8220;good&#8221; or &#8220;bad&#8221; energy audits affect the price or negotiation at all. In fact, after all the hype settled down, we stopped providing the Audit up front unless the agent wrote it into the contract. Otherwise we just provide it to the buyer at or before closing as required, and that hasn&#8217;t been a problem.</p>
<p>For our buyers, we write it into the offer that the seller will provide it prior to the end of the Option Period. But it&#8217;s never been a factor in the deal or caused a buyer to feel happy or sad.</p>
<p>Mainly, the audits are predictable and boring as they all say basically the same thing, which is: Add insulation, weather stripping, solar screens and seal the ducts. Those same 4 things dominate almost every audit, All homes have leaking ducts.</p>
<p>Therefore, we can tell a buyer in advance what the audit will say and be right 99% of the time. This makes it a non-eventful, perfunctory step in the process.</p>
<p>Other agents may report a different experience based on how they handle things.<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave McLeod</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-121425</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-121425</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Steve. It sounds like it hasn&#039;t affected realtors too much.

Have you found that homes with &quot;good&quot; energy audits can sell for a higher price than the same house with a &quot;bad&quot; energy audit? Or has there been no effect on how buyers view the value of a house they are thinking of buying?

As a real estate agent, would you include a &quot;good&quot; energy audit as a feature you would promote in the listing of a house you were selling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Steve. It sounds like it hasn&#8217;t affected realtors too much.</p>
<p>Have you found that homes with &#8220;good&#8221; energy audits can sell for a higher price than the same house with a &#8220;bad&#8221; energy audit? Or has there been no effect on how buyers view the value of a house they are thinking of buying?</p>
<p>As a real estate agent, would you include a &#8220;good&#8221; energy audit as a feature you would promote in the listing of a house you were selling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland, Austin REALTOR</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-121424</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland, Austin REALTOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-121424</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

It really hasn&#039;t caused any issues for us at all. Of course we proactively manage the process and other agents may not, but for us it&#039;s just been an extra item to deal with. 

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>It really hasn&#8217;t caused any issues for us at all. Of course we proactively manage the process and other agents may not, but for us it&#8217;s just been an extra item to deal with. </p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave McLeod</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-120847</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-120847</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve:

Now that it&#039;s one year since the implementation of ECAD, can you comment on how  it has affected the Austin real estate market? Are most home sellers complying? How are prices affected? Are any sellers motivated to improve the energy-efficiency of their homes? etc.?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve:</p>
<p>Now that it&#8217;s one year since the implementation of ECAD, can you comment on how  it has affected the Austin real estate market? Are most home sellers complying? How are prices affected? Are any sellers motivated to improve the energy-efficiency of their homes? etc.?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Durtschi</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-112141</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Durtschi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-112141</guid>
		<description>Steve and Sylvia,

I googled ECAD and came upon your site. I’ve read a few of your articles and have enjoyed them greatly. I was curios when you mentioned that the  “Realtor community worked with the city” because I’d like to be more involved. I am a home inspector in Austin and have the energy auditor certification. It is my opinion that the audits are a waste of money and that there are other means of obtaining the city’s goal of saving energy. I’m hoping you could point me in the direction of someone who represents the real estate industry side of dealing with the city.  I’ve had brief conversations with some Austin Energy officials involved in the mandatory audits but do not feel they are interested in any changes. 

Thanks and I’ll continue to subscribe to your articles.

Bill </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve and Sylvia,</p>
<p>I googled ECAD and came upon your site. I’ve read a few of your articles and have enjoyed them greatly. I was curios when you mentioned that the  “Realtor community worked with the city” because I’d like to be more involved. I am a home inspector in Austin and have the energy auditor certification. It is my opinion that the audits are a waste of money and that there are other means of obtaining the city’s goal of saving energy. I’m hoping you could point me in the direction of someone who represents the real estate industry side of dealing with the city.  I’ve had brief conversations with some Austin Energy officials involved in the mandatory audits but do not feel they are interested in any changes. </p>
<p>Thanks and I’ll continue to subscribe to your articles.</p>
<p>Bill </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-103567</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-103567</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

Thanks for your comments and the youtube links to your videos. 

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments and the youtube links to your videos. </p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Barksdale</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-103536</link>
		<dc:creator>John Barksdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-103536</guid>
		<description>Wonderful page! My name is John Barksdale and I&#039;m an Austin homeowner. I have followed this liberty-robbing ECAD ordinance with great interest and am perplexed by its  implementation. If I owned a manufactured home without a foundation, a condominium or a home 10 years old or newer, I could use 10,000 kilowatt hours a month and be exempt from the ECAD. But my abode doesn&#039;t meet these exemptions, so I&#039;m saddled with a mandatory &quot;disclosure&quot;. What angers me is the Class C misdemeanor provision; my home belongs to me, not the City of Austin and I should decide if I need to make energy improvements to MY PRIVATE PROPERTY. As a consumer (customer) of electricity, I have to use Austin Energy because it is a monopoly. I can&#039;t use any other provider.  The carbon-koolaid cult members who participated in the ECAD task force were (luckily) out-voted. Those tyrants wanted all deficiencies found during the energy audit to be corrected before the close of sale. I intend to get the ECAD misdemeanor provision eliminated through persuasion or a lawsuit. For those of you who believe in the ECAD because you believe it will negate the construction of another powerplant and feel you have the right to tell me what to with my time and capital, then I want to suggest an energy auditor audit my 1500 square home. For free. If you can come into my home and tell me to get an audit, then I should be able to tell you what to do with your labor and time. In a few years the carbon-cult special interest groups will whine to Austin City Council and persuade them to mandate the repair of all energy deficiencies uncovered in the audit. I thought it was very sneaky to mandate the audit for the seller. A seller won&#039;t have the time or resources to fight the Austin City Council and their electricity monopoly, Austin Energy. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nhx0Xax3Jjc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKt_nd9_VXc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjCpm24-_mQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful page! My name is John Barksdale and I&#8217;m an Austin homeowner. I have followed this liberty-robbing ECAD ordinance with great interest and am perplexed by its  implementation. If I owned a manufactured home without a foundation, a condominium or a home 10 years old or newer, I could use 10,000 kilowatt hours a month and be exempt from the ECAD. But my abode doesn&#8217;t meet these exemptions, so I&#8217;m saddled with a mandatory &#8220;disclosure&#8221;. What angers me is the Class C misdemeanor provision; my home belongs to me, not the City of Austin and I should decide if I need to make energy improvements to MY PRIVATE PROPERTY. As a consumer (customer) of electricity, I have to use Austin Energy because it is a monopoly. I can&#8217;t use any other provider.  The carbon-koolaid cult members who participated in the ECAD task force were (luckily) out-voted. Those tyrants wanted all deficiencies found during the energy audit to be corrected before the close of sale. I intend to get the ECAD misdemeanor provision eliminated through persuasion or a lawsuit. For those of you who believe in the ECAD because you believe it will negate the construction of another powerplant and feel you have the right to tell me what to with my time and capital, then I want to suggest an energy auditor audit my 1500 square home. For free. If you can come into my home and tell me to get an audit, then I should be able to tell you what to do with your labor and time. In a few years the carbon-cult special interest groups will whine to Austin City Council and persuade them to mandate the repair of all energy deficiencies uncovered in the audit. I thought it was very sneaky to mandate the audit for the seller. A seller won&#8217;t have the time or resources to fight the Austin City Council and their electricity monopoly, Austin Energy. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nhx0Xax3Jjc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nhx0Xax3Jjc</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKt_nd9_VXc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKt_nd9_VXc</a><br />
<span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/NjCpm24-_mQ/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Deatrick</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-95967</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Deatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 03:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-95967</guid>
		<description>Steve, your correct in the fact that a 13 SEER system is the minimum that you can currently buy or install. However, to qualify for a rebate the new system must be at least a 14 SEER/11.5 EER. For an existing home with an older system, there isn&#039;t a required minimum SEER or EER rating. As a general rule however you will find that the older the system is, the lower the SEER or EER will be.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, your correct in the fact that a 13 SEER system is the minimum that you can currently buy or install. However, to qualify for a rebate the new system must be at least a 14 SEER/11.5 EER. For an existing home with an older system, there isn&#8217;t a required minimum SEER or EER rating. As a general rule however you will find that the older the system is, the lower the SEER or EER will be.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-95879</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-95879</guid>
		<description>Mike, I think all new systems must be 13 SEER or higher.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, I think all new systems must be 13 SEER or higher.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Ferrara</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-95720</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Ferrara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-95720</guid>
		<description>Is there a minimum EER or SEER requirement for a air conditioning and heating system in a existing home? Can someone be required to replace a system with a SEER rating of 13 SEER or less?

Thank You</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a minimum EER or SEER requirement for a air conditioning and heating system in a existing home? Can someone be required to replace a system with a SEER rating of 13 SEER or less?</p>
<p>Thank You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-92085</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-92085</guid>
		<description>I think that your clients should be aware of the fact that the goal of the ordinance is to keep the City of Austin from having to build more power plants.  This will make them a little less disgruntled about the whole process.  Also, cheap fixes, e.g. duct sealing, increased insulation, will cause a home to perform significantly better on the ECAD audit and make it more attractive to buyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that your clients should be aware of the fact that the goal of the ordinance is to keep the City of Austin from having to build more power plants.  This will make them a little less disgruntled about the whole process.  Also, cheap fixes, e.g. duct sealing, increased insulation, will cause a home to perform significantly better on the ECAD audit and make it more attractive to buyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Structural Inspections &#38; Audits</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-83027</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Structural Inspections &#38; Audits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-83027</guid>
		<description>To help clarify Susan D&#039;s remark, there is really no pass or fail involved in the Audit process.  The terms &quot;pass or fail&quot; should be removed from everyone&#039;s vocabulary during a home inspection or audit.  

The Austin Audit is only a tool to help buyers / sellers understand their home and provide a general assessment of the homes energy efficiency and to recommend repairs / upgrades that may help to make the home more efficient.  What Austin Energy is asking of the ECAD Audit is actually only a small sampling of a full comprehensive Home Energy Audit.  A full comprehensive energy audit would include a blower door test to depressurize the home, gas checks, carbon monoxide inspections of gas fired appliances, and possibly an infrared camera scan and would take upwards of 4 hours to complete.  This type of audit would include hundreds of of other factors NOT even required by the Austin Audit.  These types of audits can cost upwards of $700

The Austin Energy Audit is asking only for a test of the duct system (Duct Blaster Test) and some basic energy efficiency information such as attic insulation, obvious air leaks, solar screens, etc. This is only considered a &quot;basic&quot; or &quot;partial&quot; audit at best.  The thought process that led to these requirements are somewhat based on the fact that in this area of the country, Central Texas, our homes are mostly serviced by cooling and heating systems that use &quot;flex duct&quot; materials in the attic.  These systems are notorious for leakage and replacing the bad ones and sealing the newer ones can greatly improve the energy efficiency of these homes.  As much as 30% of the the homes energy can be lost just through the ducts and attic access penetrations.  These are some of the areas that will provide the greatest efficiency gains for the least amount of money.  

There is currently a LOT of misinformation circulating about these Austin Energy Audits as well some animosity over how it all came to be.  But, for now, it is here and needs to be dealt with in the least painful way possible.  Go to Austin Energy&#039;s website and read what is required and what is NOT required.  Call several auditors and try to understand the process.  If your are currently selling your home don&#039;t sweat the audit process, ALL homes can use some improvement.  If you are buying a home don&#039;t be misled into thinking a home fails an audit if it has leaky ducts.  There is nothing that will be discovered during an energy audit that cannot be easily fixed or improved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To help clarify Susan D&#8217;s remark, there is really no pass or fail involved in the Audit process.  The terms &#8220;pass or fail&#8221; should be removed from everyone&#8217;s vocabulary during a home inspection or audit.  </p>
<p>The Austin Audit is only a tool to help buyers / sellers understand their home and provide a general assessment of the homes energy efficiency and to recommend repairs / upgrades that may help to make the home more efficient.  What Austin Energy is asking of the ECAD Audit is actually only a small sampling of a full comprehensive Home Energy Audit.  A full comprehensive energy audit would include a blower door test to depressurize the home, gas checks, carbon monoxide inspections of gas fired appliances, and possibly an infrared camera scan and would take upwards of 4 hours to complete.  This type of audit would include hundreds of of other factors NOT even required by the Austin Audit.  These types of audits can cost upwards of $700</p>
<p>The Austin Energy Audit is asking only for a test of the duct system (Duct Blaster Test) and some basic energy efficiency information such as attic insulation, obvious air leaks, solar screens, etc. This is only considered a &#8220;basic&#8221; or &#8220;partial&#8221; audit at best.  The thought process that led to these requirements are somewhat based on the fact that in this area of the country, Central Texas, our homes are mostly serviced by cooling and heating systems that use &#8220;flex duct&#8221; materials in the attic.  These systems are notorious for leakage and replacing the bad ones and sealing the newer ones can greatly improve the energy efficiency of these homes.  As much as 30% of the the homes energy can be lost just through the ducts and attic access penetrations.  These are some of the areas that will provide the greatest efficiency gains for the least amount of money.  </p>
<p>There is currently a LOT of misinformation circulating about these Austin Energy Audits as well some animosity over how it all came to be.  But, for now, it is here and needs to be dealt with in the least painful way possible.  Go to Austin Energy&#8217;s website and read what is required and what is NOT required.  Call several auditors and try to understand the process.  If your are currently selling your home don&#8217;t sweat the audit process, ALL homes can use some improvement.  If you are buying a home don&#8217;t be misled into thinking a home fails an audit if it has leaky ducts.  There is nothing that will be discovered during an energy audit that cannot be easily fixed or improved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan D.</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-82466</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 01:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-82466</guid>
		<description>As I understand it, the audit now only consists ONLY of duct leakage tests and EVERY home being tested is failing because in order to receive a passing score the home has to have less than 10% loss/leakage in a system that is not a sealed system and is not designed to be 100% leak free.  If every home tested is going to fail, than I can&#039;t see the wisdom in requiring this test!  Seems to me that what the home seller is paying for  is a document (which must be given to the potential buyer) showing that their home is somehow defective even though there is no way to make the home pass the test.  I was told by a couple of the inspectors who are doing these audits that even brand new, very high end homes are failing this required test.  How can the homeowner convince the buyer that this &quot;black mark&quot; on their property isn&#039;t important?  Home buyers I have worked with want the property they purchase to be in perfect condition and they want the seller to do (and pay for) any and all repairs that they precieve as needed.  WE (as agents) may know that every home is going to fail, but it won&#039;t be easy to convince the first time buyer that this is the case.   I think this report will deter sales if it is handed to a potential buyer before they have a vested interest in purchasing the property (ie: test results given to buyers before an offer has been accepted.)  Also, how does it reduce greenhouse emissions to conduct this test?  I also don&#039;t understand why the city feels it is fair to exempt bank foreclosures (the properties that are always in the worst condition!) mobile homes (one of the biggest culprits in wasting energy) and, now most recently condominiums.  All of these buildings generally have central HVAC systems that are the same as those in the buildings that the audit is being required on, so why are they exempt?  The ordinance should be applied to ALL buildings or it is not fair.  As it is, the poorest homeowners are the ones who will suffer the most negative effect of this ordinance.  If they can not afford to have the audit done, they will be in violation and could be fined.  If they have the audit done, their home will most certainly fail and they will not able to afford to do improvements to overcome the stigma of the failed test in order to lure buyers back to their properties.  This ordinance might have been proposed for the right reasons, but it isn&#039;t being fairly administered and, what we have ended up with is just a big expense that does nothing to correct any problems and only ends up hurting the public in the long run.  I am hoping some ACLU attorney looks into how this is going to have a much greater negative effect on minority sellers and decides to file a class action suit against the city because of the way they are administering this ordinance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it, the audit now only consists ONLY of duct leakage tests and EVERY home being tested is failing because in order to receive a passing score the home has to have less than 10% loss/leakage in a system that is not a sealed system and is not designed to be 100% leak free.  If every home tested is going to fail, than I can&#8217;t see the wisdom in requiring this test!  Seems to me that what the home seller is paying for  is a document (which must be given to the potential buyer) showing that their home is somehow defective even though there is no way to make the home pass the test.  I was told by a couple of the inspectors who are doing these audits that even brand new, very high end homes are failing this required test.  How can the homeowner convince the buyer that this &#8220;black mark&#8221; on their property isn&#8217;t important?  Home buyers I have worked with want the property they purchase to be in perfect condition and they want the seller to do (and pay for) any and all repairs that they precieve as needed.  WE (as agents) may know that every home is going to fail, but it won&#8217;t be easy to convince the first time buyer that this is the case.   I think this report will deter sales if it is handed to a potential buyer before they have a vested interest in purchasing the property (ie: test results given to buyers before an offer has been accepted.)  Also, how does it reduce greenhouse emissions to conduct this test?  I also don&#8217;t understand why the city feels it is fair to exempt bank foreclosures (the properties that are always in the worst condition!) mobile homes (one of the biggest culprits in wasting energy) and, now most recently condominiums.  All of these buildings generally have central HVAC systems that are the same as those in the buildings that the audit is being required on, so why are they exempt?  The ordinance should be applied to ALL buildings or it is not fair.  As it is, the poorest homeowners are the ones who will suffer the most negative effect of this ordinance.  If they can not afford to have the audit done, they will be in violation and could be fined.  If they have the audit done, their home will most certainly fail and they will not able to afford to do improvements to overcome the stigma of the failed test in order to lure buyers back to their properties.  This ordinance might have been proposed for the right reasons, but it isn&#8217;t being fairly administered and, what we have ended up with is just a big expense that does nothing to correct any problems and only ends up hurting the public in the long run.  I am hoping some ACLU attorney looks into how this is going to have a much greater negative effect on minority sellers and decides to file a class action suit against the city because of the way they are administering this ordinance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crossland</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-80685</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crossland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-80685</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed,

Thanks for clarifying. I thought AE provided water because all of the services are initiated and billed from the same place, but I suppose the water is separate from City of Austin and Austin Energy is simply owned by City of Austin? It&#039;s somewhat confusing. 

But your point I think is that one has to be an electricity (Austin Emergy) customer, not just a city of Austin utility customer.

Thanks

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>Thanks for clarifying. I thought AE provided water because all of the services are initiated and billed from the same place, but I suppose the water is separate from City of Austin and Austin Energy is simply owned by City of Austin? It&#8217;s somewhat confusing. </p>
<p>But your point I think is that one has to be an electricity (Austin Emergy) customer, not just a city of Austin utility customer.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Clark</title>
		<link>http://crosslandteam.com/blog/2009/05/15/city-of-austin-energy-conservation-audit-and-disclosure-ecad-program/#comment-80548</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crosslandteam.com/?p=961#comment-80548</guid>
		<description>Steve and Sylvia: Very good newsletter. Wanted to clarify a couple of quick items for you. Autin Energy sells only electricity. We have nothing to do with water.  A home must meet the ECAD ordinance requirements when sold if it is located within the City of Austin (as you indicated) and receives its electricity from Austin Energy. It is exempt  from the ECAD audit if it is less than 10 years old or has had either three energy efficiency improvements or received a total of $500 or more in rebates -- through the Austin Eneargy residential energy efficiency program -- within the past 10 years.
Thanks again for helping to spread the word and for your positive view.

Ed Clark
Communications Director
Austin Energy
(512) 322-6514</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve and Sylvia: Very good newsletter. Wanted to clarify a couple of quick items for you. Autin Energy sells only electricity. We have nothing to do with water.  A home must meet the ECAD ordinance requirements when sold if it is located within the City of Austin (as you indicated) and receives its electricity from Austin Energy. It is exempt  from the ECAD audit if it is less than 10 years old or has had either three energy efficiency improvements or received a total of $500 or more in rebates &#8212; through the Austin Eneargy residential energy efficiency program &#8212; within the past 10 years.<br />
Thanks again for helping to spread the word and for your positive view.</p>
<p>Ed Clark<br />
Communications Director<br />
Austin Energy<br />
(512) 322-6514</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

