Should Realtors Charge Transaction or Admin Fees

At a recent closing with my buyers, I noticed on the settlement statement that the listing agent charged the seller a $495 “Transaction Fee”. Good grief. I know agents who do this, and it’s not that uncommon to see a transaction fee of $195 to $495 billed to either the buyer or seller at closing, but Sylvia and I have discussed it and we simply don’t think it’s a good business practice.

Whenever I’ve asked agents about this, they justify it in various way, often saying that it pays for a transaction coordinator to keep the deal running smooth, which benefits the client. Uh, that’s my job, I think, and it’s part of what we do for the commission. Sylvia and I do use “contract to close” admin help when we get busy, but we pay for that out of pocket, just as we do for stagers, professional photographer, virtual tour, etc.

Other agents explain that each listing costs them $500 to $1,000 out of pocket, just to get the listing set up and the marketing started, and that the fee offsets those costs. I understand the arguments, and don’t completely disagree, but I can’t personally justify telling a client that I’m charging a transaction fee, or admin fee, or whatever important name we’d give. It would be a junk fee, and I hate junk fees. Bottom line, if I were a consumer hiring an agent, I wouldn’t pay it, and I can’t sell something I myself wouldn’t buy. I just can’t.

Now the courts agree with me.

From my Realtor email newsletter is this:

Court Says No Administrative Fees at Closing
Administrative fees tacked onto settlement charges violate a federal real estate settlement statutory ban against “unearned” fees, a U.S. District Court Judge in Birmingham, Ala., ruled recently.

The case involved RealtySouth, a unit of HomeServices of America Inc., the second-largest realty firm in the U.S. A buyer sued the company over a $149 administrative brokerage commission. The court found no evidence that the brokerage company performed any services beyond those covered by the commission and thus, violated the federal statutory ban.

And there we have it. Come on Realtors! We have enough of a time trying to justify how we earn a living. Tacking on these admin fees hurts our industry and makes us all look bad. Also, one veteran agent I know told me that she use to charge the fee but stopped doing it after talking with past clients who used someone else the next time. Turns out even though they didn’t complain about the fee at the time, they silently resented it, and thus didn’t call the agent back next time they needed help. So she doesn’t charge it anymore because she thinks it cost her more in lost repeat business and referrals than she gained with the fee.

The article goes on:

Read more

Why I Don’t Like “Book Rate” Repair Vendors

My long time appliance repairman John at Austin Appliance informed me today that he’s only coming into Austin once a week now, and will eventually stop serving Austin altogether. He lives in Spicewood and mainly works Marble Falls now.

Darn it. My veteran vendor team people keep getting older and retiring on me. John’s also working now as a fishing guide on Lake LBJ. Sounds better than fixing dishwashers and refrigerators I must admit. I’ve use him since the early 1990s, and I hate to lose a trusted service call vendor.

So today I put my feelers out for a new appliance company or person. I’ve had many good recommendations already but the problem I keep running into is the pricing structure that seems to be more prevalent now than it was 10+ years ago. It seems most service companies nowadays want to bill a service charge just for showing up, usually $50 to $92, then, once there, they want to quote a price based on the “book rate” of the repair, and then do the job only after the price is approved.

That doesn’t cut it for me. I don’t use “book rate” vendors because book rate pricing is a poor value for my property management owners. It’s inefficient and expensive, two things I despise. Maybe for Joe or Jane Homeowner who only need a service call once every few years, it’s not such a bad deal. You know the cost before the work is started and exactly what will be done. But I can’t operate a property management business under that pricing scheme. Instead, I need my guy to show up, fix the problem, and bill me a fair rate for time plus materials. I’m not worried about getting ripped off because, after nearly 20 years of managing and fixing rentals, I know what it should cost to fix things.

Here’s why my way is better and why I don’t use book rate people.

Read more

Austin Real Estate Investing – Then and Now

Since the end of WWII, rent prices in the U.S. have run parallel to relative sales prices consistently over time. By this I mean that a $60K home would normally rent for about $600 per month, or 1% of its sales value. The chart below illustrates the gap in sale to rent value ratios that has developed over the past 10 years in Austin in a certain class of home. I limited the stats to what I believe is the “meat and potatoes” or “bread and butter” rental stock. Those are homes between 1400-2200 square feet in size, minimum 3 bedroom, 2 bath, 2 car garage and a maximum 4 bedroom, 3 bath, 3 car garage. 

Of course there are rental properties outside these parameters, but for an investor following the approach we follow – to stick with good, basic homes that will always attract good average renters –  these are the homes that accomplish that. So the chart below shows both sold and rented homes in Austin that fall into the above profile of basic rental stock. 

 

Austin Sales to Rent value ratio from 1999 to March 2009


What we see above is that sales values essentially ran away from rent values in the early 2000s in Austin. In 1999 and 2000, the ratios for typical rental stock were holding to historic ratios. 

Our sales market would have taken a larger dip after 2001 were it not for the investors fleeing the dot.com tech stock bust and turning to real estate. Also, we had home owners unable to sell and turning to leasing instead, which created excess rental inventory and drove down rent values. 

The big question is, will these lines ever converge again, and if so, will it be because rent values increase or sales values lag until rents catch up again? Or a combination. Or, alternatively, is the old rule gone forever and rent will continue forward in our lifetimes at a ratio of about 0.75% of sales value instead of the historic 1%. How does this affect the viability of real estate investing in Austin long term?

Read more