Average rental rates for single family homes in Austin increased 6.6% from August 2005. The increase was 4.2% for July, but as of mid-year 2006 (June), the overall rental rates were down 1% from the same year to date period of 2005. So we have a two month upward trend that we need to keep an eye on. If Austin ends the year with an overall increase in rental rates, it will be the first time it’s happened since 2001. Each year since 2001, rental rates have fallen from the year before, though the rate of decrease has been getting smaller.
We are still seeing very strong absorption of new supply. Investors are keeping the market supplied with plenty of rental homes, but demand is keeping up. 41% more homes have leased through the Austin MLS through August 2006 than did through August 2005. I say this in every rental market update, but when something happens to curb investor activity, we will see rents start to increase again. That may have started happening as prices have risen nicely in the past year while rental rates have pretty much stayed flat overall. This makes the ratios harder to accept for new investors, but we still have plenty of investors buying single family homes in Austin.
July 2006
|
August 2006
|
August 2005
|
Yr % Change
|
|
# Leased |
741
|
773
|
620
|
+25%
|
Avg List Price |
$1317
|
$1363
|
$1281
|
+6.4%
|
Median List Price |
$1200
|
$1200
|
$1195
|
0%
|
Avg Leased Price |
$1307
|
$1352
|
$1268
|
+6.6%
|
Med Leased Price |
$1200
|
$1200
|
$1175
|
+2%
|
Avg Size SQFT |
1913
|
1887
|
1829
|
+3%
|
Median SQFT |
1804
|
1753
|
1722
|
+2%
|
Avg $ per SQFT |
$0.68
|
$0.72
|
$0.74
|
-3%
|
Avg Days on Mkt |
47
|
44
|
53
|
-17%
|
Median Days on Mkt |
36
|
34
|
44
|
-23%
|
Below is a Year-to-Date summary through August 2006 compared to the same period 2005. Notice that except for number of homes leased and the Days on Market, the numbers are mostly unchanged. So even though July and August are showing rental rate gains, the first part of the year lagged, bringing down the averages overall.
YTD August 2006
|
YTD August 2005
|
Yr % Change
|
|
# Leased |
5572
|
3934
|
+41%
|
Avg List Price |
$1268
|
$1259
|
0%
|
Median List Price |
$1150
|
$1150
|
0%
|
Avg Leased Price |
$1256
|
$1246
|
0%
|
Med Leased Price |
$1150
|
$1150
|
0%
|
Avg Size SQFT |
1845
|
1799
|
+3%
|
Median SQFT |
1750
|
1691
|
+3%
|
Avg $ per SQFT |
$0.68
|
$0.69
|
-1%
|
Avg Days on Mkt |
55
|
61
|
-10%
|
Median Days on Mkt |
42
|
49
|
-14%
|
Below are the August Leasing stats broken down by MLS Area. In previous months, I’ve broken down stats into broader geographic areas (combined MLS areas and/or Cities) because, on a monthly bases, the sample sizes in many particular areas are too small to be valuable. But that was resulting in some overlap. For example, “Austin” includes parts of Hays County, so stats for “Austin” might have duplicate properties from area “HD” as the northeast portion of HD has an Austin mailing address. There is not a perfect way to segment the areas, so this month I’m sticking strictly to just the MLS areas alone and I’m running the number year-to-date instead of just one month. An MLS Map is included below to you see where all the areas are.
Austin Leasing by MLS – All Areas
Houses Only – August 2006 Year to Date |
|||||||||
MLS Area
|
# Leased
|
Avg $
Leased |
Avg
SQFT |
Avg $ |
Avg
Days |
||||
Area 1A
|
18
|
$2181
|
2321
|
$0.94
|
47
|
||||
Area 1B
|
116
|
$1872
|
1572
|
$1.19
|
44
|
||||
Area 1N
|
60
|
$1374
|
1838
|
$0.75
|
44
|
||||
Area 2
|
101
|
$1134
|
1218
|
$93
|
39
|
||||
Area 2N
|
96
|
$1063
|
1455
|
$0.73
|
60
|
||||
Area 3
|
118
|
$1121
|
1403
|
$0.80
|
57
|
||||
Area 3E
|
41
|
$1082
|
1492
|
$0.73
|
65
|
||||
Area 4
|
113
|
$1554
|
1303
|
$1.19
|
50
|
||||
Area 5
|
105
|
$996
|
1204
|
$0.83
|
60
|
||||
Area 5E
|
44
|
$1028
|
1704
|
$0.60
|
73
|
||||
Area 6
|
78
|
$1328
|
1190
|
$1.12
|
38
|
||||
Area 7
|
20
|
$1478
|
1394
|
$1.06
|
30
|
||||
Area 8E
|
30
|
$2686
|
2345
|
$1.15
|
30
|
||||
Area 8W
|
66
|
$2253
|
2526
|
$0.89
|
42
|
||||
Area 9
|
16
|
$1064
|
1353
|
$0.79
|
38
|
||||
Area 10
|
400
|
$1136
|
1518
|
$0.75
|
42
|
||||
Area 11 |
91
|
$983
|
1422
|
$0.69
|
57
|
||||
Area BA |
54
|
$942
|
1558
|
$0.61
|
40
|
||||
Area BL |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||
Area BU |
3
|
$1231
|
1710
|
$0.72
|
30
|
||||
Area BW |
9
|
$1022
|
1678
|
$0.61
|
48
|
||||
Area CC |
5
|
$895
|
1294
|
$0.62
|
29
|
||||
Area CL |
689
|
$1176
|
2006
|
$0.59
|
52
|
||||
Area EL |
16
|
$1018
|
1860
|
$0.55
|
79
|
||||
Area FC |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||
Area GP |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||
Area GT |
120
|
$1156
|
1813
|
$0.64
|
55
|
||||
Area HD |
63
|
$1646
|
2178
|
$0.76
|
58
|
||||
Area HH |
295
|
$1077
|
1823
|
$0.59
|
56
|
||||
Area HS |
7
|
$1137
|
1848
|
$0.62
|
103
|
||||
Area HU |
181
|
$1033
|
1869
|
$0.55
|
70
|
||||
Area HW |
21
|
$1277
|
1803
|
$0.71
|
95
|
||||
Area JA |
2
|
$1325
|
1603
|
$0.83
|
46
|
||||
Area LC |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||
Area LH |
2
|
$987
|
1321
|
$0.75
|
14
|
||||
Area LL |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||
Area LN |
61
|
$1255
|
1675
|
$0.75
|
63
|
||||
Area LS |
140
|
$1741
|
2104
|
$0.83
|
53
|
||||
Area MA |
91
|
$1041
|
1821
|
$0.57
|
82
|
||||
Area MC |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||
Area N |
128
|
$1184
|
1735
|
$0.68
|
48
|
||||
Area NE |
140
|
$1140
|
1810
|
$0.63
|
57
|
||||
Area NW |
170
|
$1308
|
1959
|
$0.67
|
50
|
||||
Area PF |
434
|
$1143
|
1927
|
$0.59
|
64
|
||||
Area RN |
76
|
$2306
|
2854
|
$0.81
|
52
|
||||
Area RR |
840
|
$1177
|
2014
|
$0.58
|
59
|
||||
Area SC |
34
|
$1233
|
2159
|
$0.57
|
53
|
||||
Area SE |
47
|
$1058
|
1876
|
$0.56
|
79
|
||||
Area SV |
5
|
$1014
|
1633
|
$0.62
|
59
|
||||
Area SW |
296
|
$1497
|
2156
|
$0.69
|
47
|
||||
Area TC |
9
|
$763
|
1369
|
$0.55
|
75
|
||||
Area W |
42
|
$1787
|
2173
|
$0.82
|
50
|
||||
Area WE |
1
|
$695
|
1110
|
$0.63
|
38
|
||||
Area WW |
1
|
$1250
|
2016
|
$0.62
|
19
|
||||
Area OT |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
If you’re not completely familiar with Austin, dowtown is located at the lower part of Area 4 and the lower (Southeast) portion of Area 1B.
Finally, below is a graph showing historic rental averages for Austin. It shows clearly the steep fall in rental rates that started in 2002 and is approaching a bottoming out this year or next.
Thank you for taking the time to post these stats. I check your 2005/2006 home sales data periodically.
You may have no interest in this or time to do it, but it would be very interesting to know whether the McMansion ordinance has had a discernible effect on home sales in central Austin. That is, if you broke out 2005/2006 home sales by neighborhood and home or lot size, have large homes/lots seen a larger increase than small homes/lots?
Aww, Contrarian, don’t feel bad because you missed out on the Milago or other similar projects. I read your blog, and I believe the wealthy will always pay extra to live where they want to live, instead of saying “oh well” and bying cheap homes on the outskirts.
To prove my point, I will say that for several months now, MLS area 10 has been the fastest selling and appreciating area of town (that’s from the ABOR statistics). They also have some of the most affordable housing. If anything, it’s not the “McMansions” (a term coined by the jealous who can’t afford them) or downtown condos that are the problem, it’s the bargain hunting invetors from Cali.
> have large homes/lots seen a larger increase than small homes/lots?
It would be hard to test for that since the necessary MLS field showing lot size is not reliable. Many agents leave the lot deminsions blank in the listing because the lot deminsions do not always auto-populate properly.
Off the top of my head, with no data, I’d have to say I don’t think the McMansion ordinance is going to be detrimental to the resell value of older central homes on smaller lots.
Steve